Suzuki And Mitsubishi U.S. Sales: 2001 – 2010

Imagine General Motors suffering an 82% drop in sales over the course of the last decade. You know what this would do to the U.S. car market? For one thing, it would’ve meant GM only sold 875,279 vehicles in America in 2010 instead of the 2.2 million the conglomerate actually sold. But, tragically in a purely hypothetical fashion, an 82% decline over the last decade would have placed the city of Detroit in an even worse state of affairs. Through all of this, it’s worth noting that the market as a whole has decreased by 33% since the 2001 calendar year.

Despite the market’s overall decline, the Graph below showcasing Mitsubishi’s drastic downfall since 2001, or even 2002, as well as Suzuki’s sharp cliff-dive after 2007, doesn’t mince facts. In fact, trends and lines and numbers like you see here should cause even the most casual observers to wonder why Mitsubishi and Suzuki maintain a presence in the United States. And how the two Japanese companies maintain a presence.

Suzuki sold 11,529 Grand Vitaras in 2002 plus another 27,295 XL-7s. In 2010, there were just 313 Suzuki XL-7 sales and just 4478 Grand Vitaras sold. The heavily-marketed and much talked about Kizashi, an intended rival for America’s midsize sedan segment, found only 6138 buyers in 2010. As for Mitsubishi, the company sold 95,287 SUVs in 2003. Galant sales topped 65,000. (Mitsubishi sold 55,683 vehicles in total in 2010.) In varying volumes, Mitsubishi sold nine different models in 2003. Only seven models found buyers in 2010, one of which was the Raider and its nine customers. Galant sales totalled 11,492, down more than 80% since 2003 in what is still a popular segment, a segment which possesses America’s two best-selling cars, the 2011 Toyota Camry and 2011 Honda Accord.

The second chart below compares Mitsubishi and Suzuki with other Japanese auto brands. Of the 4,475,698 Japanese cars sold in the United States in 2010, more than one-third were Toyotas; approximately one-quarter were Hondas. Mitsubishi’s market share – and remember, this is just among Japanese vehicle sales – was 1.2%; Suzuki’s just 0.5%. On the market as a whole, Suzuki’s market share was as high as 0.6% in 2007 but stands at just 0.2% at the end of 2010. Mitsubishi possessed 2% of the whole U.S. new vehicle market in 2002 but held just 0.5% in 2010.

The 2010 Suzuki Kizashi appeared to be a signal that the famous motorcycle manufacturer wasn’t giving up on the North American automobile marketplace. Of course, observers and analysts wonder if the Kizashi’s failure has caused Suzuki to at least consider throwing in the towel. Mitsubishi, on the other hand, wants to start assembling more vehicles at its Illinois plant in 2012 or 2013. That doesn’t sound like surrender. 

For a little perspective on Mitsubishi, consider the prices of its least and most-expensive cars. The 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer has a base price of $15,195, the 2011 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution starts at $33,995. In between these two Lancer variants are a midsize SUV, a small SUV, an urban-runabout SUV with basically the same name as the small SUV, an ugly convertible and its ugly coupe twin, a midsize sedan, and a Lancer-based hatchback. 

Suzuki waters are not unmuddied. There’s a Nissan Frontier-based pickup truck, the Equator. The Grand Vitara is a ladder-frame unibody competitor for America’s best-selling utility vehicle, the Honda CR-V. The $13,499 2011 Suzuki SX4, particularly as the $16,999 SX4 Crossover variant, is a rebadged Fiat Sedici. Yep, the Fiat that now runs Chrysler. And then there’s the aforementioned Kizashi, a handsome sedan wearing the badge of a brand that’s never been able to remotely succeed in marketing midsize sedans to Americans before.

Is there hope for Mitsubishi and/or Suzuki? Check out the forward-thinking Mitsubishi i and the not-for-North America Suzuki Swift Sport as evidence that these two companies, or at least departments within these companies, have a clue.

Related From GoodCarBadCar.net
U.S. Auto Sales By Brand – 2010 Year End
New Vehicle Market Share By Brand In America – 2010 Year End
Hyundai USA Market Share Growth: 1999-2010
The 15 Worst-Selling Vehicles In America – 2010 Year End

  1. Mitsubishi was the 13th ranked auto company in 2002. That was better than VW, Mazda, Kia and every luxury brand.

  2. Im surprised about Suzuki. Worldwide they are competitors in most markets. Now they have no brand recognition so I dont know how they can regain market share.

  3. Suzuki's position in the US is bizarre. Almost as bizarre as the decisions they make on models for the US market.

    While they have always had problems historically in terms of product range not fitting American preferences, they have outstanding product available in segments that have become more poopular over time. Yet they insist on crippling their US models. Take the Grand Vitara. In many countries it comes with a wider range of engines that provide more power and better performance. Yet, in the US, it has been lumbered for years with feeble V6's and (eventually) arthritic inline 4's. Where's the diesel that's available in most countries? Where's the 5 sped gearbox on the high performance 4? Why is the SX4 Crossover stuck with the worst engine choice out of the entire range of options available in every other country? Why does it not have the feature list available outside the US? Why has the Swift taken so long to appear?

    It's almost as if Suzuki uses the US as a dumping ground for the staff that can't perform, taking what happens in most Japanese corporations of shuffling the incompetents off to a department where they can do no harm, but for Suzuki, the 4th largest Japanese auto maker, using the entire US market as that "career wasteland" department for them.

    Suzuki has great product available. Just not in the US.

  4. You have it the other way around. The Fiat Sedici is a rebadged Suzuki SX4, built by Suzuki in Hungary.

  5. @anonymous, oh un-named one, that all depends on whether you consider rebadges to mean the reintroduction of a product under a new name and logo or just another introduction of a product. Some would say it doesn't matter. The SX4 and Sedici aren't considered successful small cars anywhere.

  6. @anonymous, oh un-named one, that all depends on whether you consider rebadges to mean the reintroduction of a product under a new name and logo or just another introduction of a product. Some would say it doesn't matter. The SX4 and Sedici aren't considered successful small cars anywhere.

  7. Im surprised about Suzuki. Worldwide they are competitors in most markets. Now they have no brand recognition so I dont know how they can regain market share.

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.