2016 Acura ILX A-Spec Review - Substantially Upgraded

2016 Acura ILX A-Spec
For the entry-level Acura’s fourth model year, the ILX is undergoing a complete powertrain transformation. LED headlights and trim-line changes further differentiate the refreshed 2016 ILX, but the less visible changes are the real difference makers.

• High-tech transmission

• Aggressive Sport mode
• Roomy rear seat
• LKAS is a wonder
• Proper standard engine
• Interior far from special
• Harsh impacts
• Dual-screen layout sucks
• Still needs to be revved
• Lacks headroom

Gone is the ILX Hybrid, the base ILX’s 2.0L four-cylinder, and Acura’s last remaining manual transmission. The sole powerplant is now a 201-horsepower 2.4L from base versions of the TLX.

2015 Acura TLX V6 SH-AWD Driven Review
2014 Acura MDX Elite Driven Review

The Honda Civic-based ILX therefore isn’t using the same engine as the range-topping Civic Si, and it’s certainly not using any of the Civic’s transmissions. Instead, the 2016 ILX is equipped with an 8-speed dual-clutch unit.

Honda figured out a way to make the DCT operate with a torque converter, and as a result, it’s a more refined dual-clutch transmission (especially at lower around-town speed) than you’ll encounter elsewhere in the dual-clutch universe, though without some of the hard-hitting edge of some competitors. There’s also an aggressive Sport mode for twisty roads and people who drive around downtown on Saturday nights, windows down, one gear too low, with revs wailing. To impress the ladies, maybe.
2016 Acura ILX A-Spec
Base Price: $31,585 *
As-Tested Price: $36,985 *
Drive Type: front-wheel-drive
Transmission: 8-speed dual-clutch automatic
Engine: 2.4L DOHC 16-valve I-4
Horsepower: 201 @ 6800 rpm
Torque: 180 lb-ft @ 3600 rpm
Curb Weight: 2919 pounds
Length: 181.9 inches
Width: 70.6 inches
Height: 55.6 inches
Wheelbase: 105.1 inches
Tires: Bridgestone Blizzak
Tire Size: 225/40R18
Passenger Volume: 2530 litres
Cargo Volume: 348 litres
EPA City: 25 mpg
EPA Hwy: 36 mpg
NRCAN OEE City: 9.3 L/100km
NRCAN OEE Hwy: 6.6 L/100km
Observed: 29 mpg
Observed: 8.1 L/100km
* Canadian dollars, includes $2095 in fees.
MPG fuel economy ratings from the
Environmental Protection Agency.
L/100km ratings from the Canadian
Office of Energy Efficiency's new
5-cycle testing.
Consequently, compared with both the former base and up-level engines, the 2016 ILX is a significantly quicker car; the extra ponies enhancing the performance compared with the old 2.0L and the 8-speed transmission producing faster shifts compared with the outgoing 2.4L/manual combo. As you’d expect from Honda, the 2.4L revs sweetly and makes a pleasant noise.

At the very least, the ILX is now sufficiently powerful, but that’s only one element in terms of what could make an appealing entry-level luxury sports sedan. Don’t be fooled by the A-Spec package – aside from 18-inch wheels, it’s cosmetic.

The ILX doesn’t turn-in with sports car gusto and the steering is generally lacking in feel. There’s noticeable body roll, but it’s not excessive in the real world. The car rides stiffly, especially out back, but not too stiffly. Grip and feel was likely limited during the car’s visit by Bridgestone Blizzak winter tires, but those tires didn’t camouflage the fact that the ILX treads middle ground between performance sedans and conventional, mainstream small sedans.

The ILX also resides in a neutral territory inside, where the interior is a mix of upmarket Acura design and lower-tier Honda materials. The plastic surround on the centre tunnel, for example, is rock hard. The climate control unit would be suitable in a Fit. But the (unintuitive) dual screens, buttons for autonomous Lane Keeping Assist and adaptive cruise control, an effective Cross Traffic monitoring system, and “lux-suede inserts” on the seats would be suitable in an MDX.
2016 Acura ILX interior
Perhaps of greater importance is the spacious back seat and flat rear floor, which aren’t at all the norm in this category. Parents who periodically move child seats between cars won’t be happy with the location of the LATCH anchors, but the overall sensation inside is of sufficient space, not claustrophobia.

In isolation, the ILX is not a disappointing car, particularly when luxed-up and body-kitted like this loaded A-Spec car. But the overly stiff rear suspension and the way the ILX crashes over harsh pavement imperfections reminds me of just how serenely the Buick Verano Turbo makes its way down the road. The ILX’s steering is too numb and its lack of outright athleticism too apparent not to bring to mind the Audi A3’s GTI-like ride and handling balance. And while the additional standard horsepower of the 2016 model finally makes the ILX a competitive car, the 2.4L is surely no torque-monster. These aren’t the VTEC high-revvers of yesteryear – the ILX feels decently quick before it’s revving past 6000 rpm – but with only 180 lb-ft of torque, it’s down by 78 lb-ft compared with Mercedes-Benz’s CLA250, a car which never wants for instant shove. There are ways in which the ILX is better than all these cars, but the Acura’s comparative deficiencies are more obvious than its advantages.
2016 Acura ILX collage
All Photo Credits: Timothy Cain ©www.GoodCarBadCar.net
Click Any Of Images For A Larger View
We’ve yet to see the impact of the refreshed ILX’s launch, as this is a 2016 model year vehicle released early in 2015. It’s undoubtedly an improved car, but will near-luxury buyers even know that it’s an updated car? The ILX first arrived three years ago and this refreshed car isn’t obviously new.

Canadian sales peaked at 3192 units in its first full year, 2013, but the ILX fell 14% in 2014 and first-quarter volume in 2015 is off last year’s pace by 15%. Year-to-date, the ILX sells once for every 1.7 Audi A3s and once for every two Mercedes-Benz CLAs. This least costly Acura accounts for 27% of the brand’s car volume; 11% of total Acura sales.
2016 Acura ILX A-Spec interior collage
In order for Honda to move the ILX up the leaderboard and make it a more meaningful product in Acura showrooms, it would need to feel a lot more special than this. “Not special” is a vague verdict, but it can be summed up this way: our test car was a (CDN) $36,985 version of a car that starts at $31,585, and it’s abundantly clear that the foundation of that car is a sedan that starts below $18K.

Humble origins aren’t a problem. The failure to adequately mask those origins, however, in a $35K+ car, in an arena controlled by Germans which are afforded special status on the basis of their badges alone, is in fact a problem.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please stay on topic. Feel free to argue and debate, but stay friendly and do not get personal. Comments signed as Anonymous will likely be rejected as possible spam. Login with a Google account or assign yourself a name. Keep in mind, kids read this site.

If the post on which you are commenting is more than 40 days old, the comment will undergo moderation as a means of avoiding spam.