This all-wheel-drive Cadillac XTS is not an outright Cadillac V car, not like the XLR-V, the STS-V, and what will soon be the third-generation CTS-V. Instead, the Vsport tag, first seen on the third-gen CTS, is a midway point.
• Historical Monthly & Yearly Cadillac XTS Sales Figures
• 2014 Cadillac CTS Vsport Driven Review
Except in the XTS’s case, there will be no V, presumably because upping the ante would just be silly, given that the 410-horsepower XTS Vsport already manifests torque steer despite its AWD configuration.
• Massive interior
• Much acceleration
• Lots of premium features
• Amazing paint
• Edgy styling
|THE BAD |
• CUE sucks
• Slow steering, huge dead zone
• This is a lot of money
• $1295 for the paint?
• Styling won't please everyone
This, therefore, is Maximum XTS, the latest, flashiest, fastest car in a long line of big Cadillacs stretching back to your grandfather’s Fleetwood Brougham and his boss’s post-war Sixty Special.
In Canada, a base front-wheel-drive XTS starts at USD $51,240, destination fees included. $56,800 is the starting point for all-wheel-drive XTS.The Vsport model begins at $67,875, but the Vsport Platinum ($76,170) can be optioned up beyond $78,000 with rear seat DVD. XTS Vsports are rated at a converted 14.7 L/100km in the city, 9.8 in the city.
2015 CADILLAC XTS V SPORT PLATINUM
Base Price * (CAD): $76,045
As-Tested Price * (CAD): $77,565
Engine: 3.6L DOHC 24-valve twin-turbo V6
Transmission: 6-speed automatic
Horsepower: 410 @ 6000 rpm
Torque: 369 lb-ft @ 1900 rpm
Curb Weight: 4437 pounds °
Drive Type: all-wheel-drive
Length: 202 inches
Width: 72.9 inches
Height: 59.5 inches
Wheelbase: 111.7 inches
Tires: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire Size: 245/40R20
Passenger Volume: 2951 litres
Cargo Volume: 510 litres
EPA City: 16 mpg
EPA Highway: 24 mpg
Observed: 16 mpg
Observed: 14.7 L/100km
* includes $1800 destination charge
° according to Car & Driver
XTS Platinum AWD base price: $70,190
XTS V Sport Premium base price: $67,875
MPG fuel economy ratings from the
Environmental Protection Agency.
L/100km ratings from the Canadian
Office of Energy Efficiency's new
5-cycle testing results for MY2015
XTSs are not yet available.
The sense of high quality is deeper than the paint. Moving inside, the XTS’s headliner and pillars are slathered in alcantara. There’s real wood sourced from real trees. Four of the 14 Bose speakers are perched just above the front occupants’ shoulders for impressive surround sound audio. CUE, though sluggish and frustrating when in use, makes for a stylishly minimalistic flip-up centre panel. The XTS Vsport’s gauge cluster is light years beyond the setup so often decried in the ATS.
Moreover, if “premium” and “luxury” and “upscale” still go hand in hand with acreage, the XTS is a winner regardless of equipment levels and material quality. It’s 19.2 inches longer than the ATS, 6.5 inches longer than the CTS, with a cabin that’s 7.4% larger than the CTS’s. If you want bigger luxury, long-wheelbase Germans are the way to go. The Audi A8L is 5.4 inches longer with 2.9 inches of extra rear legroom and a cabin that’s 17% larger. But the A8L, like most cars, can’t beat the XTS’s 18 cubic feet of cargo capacity.
(Compared with the final version of its DTS successor, the XTS is 5.6 inches shorter and nearly two inches narrower with marginally less rear legroom and 2.4 fewer inches of rear hiproom. The trunk and the overall cabin size are both slightly smaller than they were a generation ago, as well.)
Fortunately, once on the move the XTS doesn’t feel as immense as its dimensions suggest. Visibility is far better than in the smaller CTS and the XTS’s steering is more than light enough to ease slow-speed maneuvering. Naturally, there’s a lot of weight (4215 pounds) to toss around a corner. That avoirdupois, combined with slow and feathery steering and braking response that’s not up to the standards of modern performance cars, discourages the truly aggressive driving which the CTS Vsport constantly invites. Yet at the same time, the XTS performs the trick of driving like a somewhat (and only somewhat) smaller car, which becomes its most encouraging dynamic trait.
|All Photo Credits: Timothy Cain ©www.GoodCarBadCar.net|
Click Any Of ImagesFor A Larger View
Remembering the potency of this engine, you didn’t reach such speeds quite as quickly as you expected. The 3.6L twin-turbo makes 10 more horsepower and 61 more lb-ft of torque when placed under the hood of the CTS Vsport, which weighs less than 4000 pounds and sends power to the rear wheels with an 8-speed automatic. By the standards of that car’s transmission, the XTS Vsport’s 6-speed automatic is sluggish, but its all-around smoothness will be appreciated by the XTS’s dwindling clientele.
Canadian XTS sales are down 15% to just 638 units through the first eleven months of 2014. Thus, it may not have mattered if the XTS Vsport was equipped with a Hellcat-like V8 and ZF’s famed 8-speed automatic, as this still wouldn’t be a vehicle in which the typical car buyer of today has any interest. (And does the typical buyer of yesterday have any interest in battling the Cadillac User Interface on a daily basis?) Though relatively fleet-friendly, the XTS sells far less often than the far pricier and recently redesigned Mercedes-Benz S-Class; more often than the Jaguar XF, Lexus GS, and BMW 6-Series. GM Canada sold more than 1300 DTSs as recently as 2006, a year in which Lincoln sold 1107 Town Cars.
The market has moved away from traditional full-size sedans and is moving away from Cadillac’s car division in its home market, too. The brand’s passenger cars are down 15% to 79,139 units in the United States with one month remaining in 2014 as Cadillac reportedly pursues a premium image not in keeping with price cuts.
• 2014 Cadillac SRX Driven Review
• 2014 Chevrolet Impala LTZ Driven Review
Indeed, ever since the as-tested price was mentioned, you’ve been wanting to pipe in with the names of countless other cars available at a similar price point: BMW 550i xDrive, Lexus LS460, Audi A7 TDI, and Jaguar XJ, cars with reputations for athleticism, refinement, technological prowess, and panache which Cadillac can’t match. That might be missing the point. The XTS Vsport won’t be the car you buy because of how well it stacks up against the competition. It’s the XTS you buy because you were going to buy an XTS anyway, and this is the maximized XTS.
Of course, I wasn’t going to buy a regular 304-horsepower XTS. Sales figures suggest you weren’t going to either. But I won’t deny that for the prospective XTS buyer, this Vsport provides the kind of accelerative experience that makes the conventional XTS feel dreadfully pedestrian.